Springfield bucks Undesirable Land Use

SbULU.org

 
Please endorse Our Petition to Show You Oppose PPL's Plan!

Making a Stand for Our Land!

About Us | Background | Calendar | Maps |Media | Photos | Stories
Action | Donate and Help | Endorse Petition | FAQ | References | Talking Points | White Paper

Opposition to Pennsylvania Power & Light’s “preferred”
route for Power Lines & Station in Springfield Township

White paper ~ May 2008

Full text as PDF

 Executive Summary

Background: Pennsylvania Power and Light (PPL) has presented a proposal for a new power transmission line between Quakertown and Coopersburg.  The proposal outlines three potential routes for the line, with the PPL “preferred” route being “cross country” through farm fields, floodplains and woodlands. 

Although not specifically outlined in the proposal, it has been brought to our attention that PPL intends to construct a 5-7 acre substation along the Cross Country route on the former Creticos property on Hickon Rd.

Position statement: 

The residents of Springfield Township are not anti-PPL. We recognize the need for an effective and economical means of providing energy.  We’re not opposed to PPL crossing Springfield Township. The alternative Route 309 corridor also crosses Springfield Twp., but it already has roads, telephone lines, and a PPL easement. The other alternative route follows the existing SEPTA right of way with its unused track.  Using a modification of the existing easement is less intrusive than tearing out a several mile long 100-foot wide swath through our Resource Protection Area. 

o    We favor either alternative route for the power lines and substations:

Alternative 1 – SEPTA route, 9.45 miles (1.4 mi in Springfield Township)
Alternative 3 – 309 corridor, 9.59 miles (2.2 mi in Springfield Township)

We favor these routes because they are more commercial and industrial, thus environment impacts and stigmatizing effects of a power grid would be minimal.

We note that the most prevalent argument presented by PPL against the alternative routes is cost, time and inconvenience to PPL.

o   We oppose PPL’s "preferred" Cross Country route for power lines and substations.

Alternative 2 – Cross country, 7.09 miles* (2.6 mi in Springfield Township)

We oppose this route because we wish to preserve and protect open spaces, water quality, biodiversity, and the rural and historic character of Springfield Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania.  We also oppose this route because we wish to protect property values that are dependent on the rural character and environmental health of the region.

o    We are concerned about methods used by PPL to procure land - apparently based on self-interest, and convenience – based on its own research and interpretations and ahead of PUC approval

PPL’s conflict of interest should preclude it from performing impact studies, or interpreting the results of others hired to perform impact studies.

We are also concerned how PPL represented this project to the landowners while negotiating easements.  SbULU has been told numerous times that these representatives indicated that the project had already been approved and that if the landowner did not sign an easement, they would be subject to eminent domain condemnation of their property. 

Alternative Routes

Alternative 1 – SEPTA route, 9.45 miles (1.4 mi in Springfield Township)

Alternative 2 – Cross country, 7.09 miles (2.6 mi in Springfield Township)

Alternative 3 – 309 corridor, 9.59 miles (2.2 mi in Springfield Township)

 


Topics

bulletBackground
bulletSignificant problems with PPL’s “preferred” route ALT 2 – cross country route
bulletThe PPL Report and Environmental Impact Analysis is Inadequate
bulletElectrical Considerations
bulletImpact on Property Values
bulletConflict of Interest
bulletWhat is easiest and cheapest is not always in the public interest
bulletIn Conclusion

 

Appendix

bulletComparing Costs and Other Factors by Routes
bulletFrequently Asked Questions
bulletAbout Springfield bucks Undesirable Land Use (sbulu.org)

 
See Full text as PDF

 

 

Web inquiries Karl | Last modified: July 21, 2008 | Contact Us